Evince image viewer cannot view PNG

Nio Wiklund nio.wiklund at gmail.com
Mon Sep 23 09:12:38 UTC 2013


See this bug report that is about the same problem with the menu entry
names.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/lxkeymap/+bug/1128600

Best regards
Nio

On 2013-09-21 14:55, Andre Rodovalho wrote:
> What about the menu structure, it's possible to take advantage from
> that. For example:
> 
> Graphics
> ..... Editor (mtpaint)
> ..... Viewer (viewnior)
> or
> ..... mtPaint (Editor)
> ..... Viewnior (Viewer)
> 
> Some menu could have subdivisions:
> 
> Office
> ..... Text
> .......... Libreoffice Writer
> .......... Abiword
> ..... Spreadsheet
> .......... Libreoffice Calc
> .......... Gnumeric
> ..... Viewer
> .......... Evince
> ..... Others
> .......... Libreoffice Base
> .......... pdfsam
> .......... gLabels
> 
> 
> 2013/9/21 Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund at gmail.com <mailto:nio.wiklund at gmail.com>>
> 
>     On 2013-09-21 05:41, Jonathan Marsden wrote:
>     ...
>     >
>     > If you want to argue for something more like:
>     >
>     >   Graphics Editor (mtpaint)
>     >
>     > that's fine, at least it still includes the program name and so is
>     > distinguishable from (for example):
>     >
>     >   Graphics Editor (gimp)
>     >
>     > One issue I see here is that, as I currently understand it, these
>     labels
>     > are in files currently installed as part of each package, so to change
>     > them, you would want to persuade each package maintainer to make that
>     > change... which is a LOT of work!  Further, if Lubuntu decides that we
>     > want "Function (name)", but Ubuntu decides they want "Function", guess
>     > which one most package maintainers will use :)  Technically, we
>     might be
>     > able to maintain our own database of the menu labels we want and use
>     > something fix them up after installation, but that seems ugly, and
>     prone
>     > to political trouble from package maintainers who could probably claim
>     > we are overriding their express intent...
>     >
>     > I'd say we leave any package that has both application name and
>     function
>     > in its label alone, and focus on ones that lack one of those in their
>     > menu label... just to shrink the scale of the task.
>     >
>     > Jonathan
>     >
>     >
> 
>     I think it would be nice to have something like this:
> 
>     Document viewer (evince)
>     etc.
> 
>     But I realize there might be obstacles along the road to get there.
> 
>     Best regards
>     Nio
> 
>     --
>     Lubuntu-users mailing list
>     Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
> 
> 




More information about the Lubuntu-users mailing list