RAM Usage During Installation of Lubuntu (was: zRAM)
Aere Greenway
Aere at Dvorak-Keyboards.com
Sat Jun 8 19:19:51 UTC 2013
On 06/08/2013 12:52 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
> I have failed to produce that issue no matter how many times I have tired.
>
> I even tried below 256MB of RAM but that did not crash the
> installation at all. YES, the installation process was SO SLOW but
> never crashed, in all my tests.
>
> So, I'm not defeating the idea as a whole, I'm stating what I've found
> and what my so many tests for 2 years had shown and proved to my, at
> least.
> It is not that I don't believe you, but I can't disagree with my eyes too.
>
Ali:
I am sure what you state from your experience is true. But what I state
from my experience is also true.
My experience differs from yours. That probably means there is a
difference in how we go about installing a system on a 512 meg RAM machine.
If you usually use a bootable USB, then the following paragraphs apply:
I almost always use the live CD, because my low-RAM machines won't boot
from a USB-drive without making use of 3rd party software. Also, many of
the candidate machines have only the old type 1 USB, which is slower
than a CD.
If Lubuntu needs to be installed from a USB (for machines having 512 meg
RAM), it ought to be clearly stated, and there should be a way of
creating such a USB that works, and doesn't require typing commands in a
terminal (if ordinary users need to do it). Also, there need to be
links to the 3rd-party software to allow your machine to boot from a USB
(for cases where the hardware doesn't support it).
--
Sincerely,
Aere
More information about the Lubuntu-users
mailing list