Chromium vs Firefox : Need testimonies

[Phill Whiteside]

I'm still somewhat  confused as to why more tests are needed? The set I
carried out for Chad Miller were a full set of tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+/chromium-bsourcerowser/+bug/1096603 If
he asks for further tests under what ever system he requires, he knows to
ask. The bug is assigned to him, and he has recently posted up
http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/1ernda/some_more_reasons_for_sticking_with_firefox_as/ca5gmf9


Do we, as lubuntu, support losing 32 bit? No, we do not. Allow Chad to make
the call on whether v27 is viable for us. He knows a lot more about this
area than any of us :)


Regards,

Phill.

On 1 June 2013 23:15, Yorvyk <yorvik.ubunto at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On 01/06/13 23:06, Andre Rodovalho wrote:
>
>> Another test:
>>
>> Facebook only: Firefox: 134.30 MB Chromium: 127784k
>>
>> Facebook + Gmail: Firefox: 278.01 MB Chromium: 139352k
>>
>> My Firefox has some extentions (xMarks, Flash Video Downloader,
>> Ubuntu Mod. and Global Menu...)
>>
>> Chromium has no extentions!
>>
>>
>>
>>  Which makes the figures somewhat meaningless. It's easy to run FF with
> out extensions. Look in the Help menu there is an option to restart FF
> with Add-ons Disabled. This will give comparative figures.
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> --
> Lubuntu-users mailing list
> Lubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/**
> mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
>
> --
> <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users>
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/attachments/20130601/21af80bb/attachment.html>