[lubuntu-devel] consistent QA help really needed

Herminio Hernandez, Jr. herminio.hernandezjr at gmail.com
Sun Mar 11 01:46:59 UTC 2018

I would like to hep test. However the Lubuntu Beta1 has been disabled.
Should I try the Lubuntu daily iso?

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Walter Lapchynski <wxl at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> Howdy folks,
> Lubuntu really needs you right now.
> Lubuntu has, as long as I've been involved with it, always been involved
> in every single milestone release, including the alphas. We have been
> adamant about this, even when other flavours don't. This goes quite
> against the current opinion among the Ubuntu Release Team to get rid of
> milestones altogether.
> With that said, I'm sure you can imagine what a shocking occurance it
> was to find that we did not have sufficient testing to release Beta 1
> this week.
> I admit that there were some extenuating circumstances, including some
> really annoying new bugs affecting us alone (including [one][1] that
> fundamentally cripples the installation process at an early stage), but
> this also shines the light on the fact that we really are in need of
> help.
> Lubuntu has always been a small team. That's never really changed.
> Circumstances in the lives of core team members have resulted in a
> little less activity on their part. In general, this wouldn't be too
> much of an issue. We've weathered similar storms, but we need people to
> finish this cycle successfully given the aforementioned extenuating
> circumstances.
> That said, I have a humble request: maybe just an hour of your time a
> week?
> I recognize that some activities require a degree of skill that many
> people don't have, but even the most casual user can make a significant
> difference in QA.
> Testing, as it affects us mostly, involves following a set of predefined
> steps towards installing a system. If you don't have spare hardware,
> this can be done on a virtual machine (this is easier than it might
> sound). This can be done daily to keep track of overall quality. Look
> for bugs that have already been reported. Even just confirming a bug
> report can make a huge difference, let alone adding more information.
> Filing a new bug is also huge. Marking a testcase (that's what we call
> one set of install steps) as succesful or unsuccesful can be equally
> valid.
> Similarly, looking through existing bugs and confirming them can be
> really useful. Not to mention even dealing with older bugs that don't
> affect the development cycle. Even invalidating one of these older ones
> can cut down on the overall workload.
> I guess what I'm saying is that you don't need to be a developer. You
> don't need to make a job out of contributing to Lubuntu. Just a little
> bit of your time would make a difference.
> What do you all think? If that's not convincing enough, what hurdles do
> you face that perhaps the team could help with? Are you interested but
> don't know what we're talking about? We will happily provide free
> training.
> Your thoughts on these matters would be most appreciated and our
> gratitude for your help will be abundant.
> Thanks in advance,
> Walter
> [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1754174
> --
>        @wxl | polka.bike
> C563 CAC5 8BE1 2F22 A49D
> 68F6 8B57 A48B C4F2 051A
> --
> Lubuntu-devel mailing list
> Lubuntu-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-devel/attachments/20180310/150e37d2/attachment.html>

More information about the Lubuntu-devel mailing list