[loco-contacts] UGJ dates (draft)
Keith I Myers
keithiokepamyers at gmail.com
Tue Dec 2 15:32:08 UTC 2014
I am also in agreement with February.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Sergio Meneses <
sergioandresmeneses at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello guys!
> I am agree with Lyz, February is much better. :D ... and Daniel's idea is
> pretty awesome but what way we must use for doing this? a poll on LP or
> Sergio Meneses
> Linux User: #478743
> Ubuntu User: #24056
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Daniel Holbach <daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com
> > wrote:
>> On 27.11.2014 03:02, Nathan Haines wrote:
>> > On 11/26/2014 04:15 PM, Svetlana Belkin wrote:
>> >> On 11/26/2014 07:14 PM, José Antonio Rey wrote:
>> >>> An idea popped up to do two UGJs in a cycle, both with different
>> >>> objectives due to dates and freezes happening.
>> >> That can work, and perhaps is the right choice.
>> > I think splitting an underattended event into two events and doubling
>> > the administrative overhead is probably a really bad idea.
>> Maybe reach out to the individual teams and ask them in an online form
>> which dates they'd like to participate in?
>> [x] 1st Vivid Global Jam (Development+?)
>> [x] 2nd Vivid Global Jam (Testing+Translations+?)
>> Or something like that?
>> Have a great day,
>> Get involved in Ubuntu development! http://packaging.ubuntu.com
>> Follow @ubuntudev on twitter.com/facebook.com/G+
>> loco-contacts mailing list
>> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> Ubuntu-community-team mailing list
> Ubuntu-community-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Keith I Myers
[image: http://]+Keith I Myers <http://plus.kmyers.me/>
Mobile : (305)-929-3475
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the loco-contacts