Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Tiago Hillebrandt]

Hi folks,

I think that "sponsored" is great :-)


2013/2/8 Elizabeth Krumbach <lyz at ubuntu.com>

> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Darcy Casselman <dscassel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > My vote would be for calling it like it is: Sponsored.
> >
> > Anything that appears to confer special status or recognition ends up
> with
> > similar problems to "approved."
> >
> > It makes the pitch a lot easier too: "Go through our process and we give
> you
> > stuff. If not, coo'. Either way, keep spreading Ubuntu!"
>
> I've been following this thread all along, and this post is the one I
> keep thinking of. This accurately describes my feelings too.
>
> I also would like to note, it hasn't just been Canonical who uses
> "approval" as a mechanism for giving gifts, Prentice Hall used it as
> the criteria for who they would send copies of the Official Ubuntu
> Book to:
> http://www.jonobacon.org/2011/07/05/free-official-ubuntu-book-for-approved-loco-teams/
>
> --
> Elizabeth Krumbach // Lyz // pleia2
> http://www.princessleia.com
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>



-- 
*Tiago Hillebrandt*
Ubuntu Member
Ubuntu Brazilian Community Council Member
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130208/a26318da/attachment-0001.html>