Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Laura Czajkowski]

On 08/02/13 18:06, Martin Owens wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
>> thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have
>> forgotten/dint have time to update their wiki or portal page for some
>> time whilst organizing events on a regular basis? 
> We've made the tools pretty easy, if there's no activity on the portal
> page, then there's really no way to know 'online' if there is activity.
> So an online-activity status must follow from online-activity, not from
> offline-activity.
>
> We can't really measure offline-activity.
>
> Martin,
>
>
No I think that's a bit unfair the loco council has looked at team
report, blog posts, photos of events that happen off line and we make
the judgement call.  Many people create events on the LTP, some don't
but do add it to their website.   While it is not mandatory to use the
LTP and many people do use it some teams prefer to use their own tools.

Laura

-- 
Laura Czajkowski 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/czajkowski
LoCo Council Member 
Community Council Member