Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Bhavani Shankar R]

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Martin Owens <doctormo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:27 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> something like those locoteams which are active and get approved by
>> the LoCo council will end up in the sponsored list and yet to be
>> approved teams fall in a  not so active category?.
>
> Oh no, no, active would simply be 'has the group edited anything on
> loco-teams in the past 6 months'. It's more of an extreme way to
> discount truly inactive, abandoned groups and maybe find a way to get
> new people involved.
>

I like the idea given the fact that tracking the locoteams portal or
wiki for past 6 months because it can be easily tracked compared to
team reports or meetings etc for instance, because of the structure,

But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have
forgotten/dint have time to update their wiki or portal page for some
time whilst organizing events on a regular basis?

Regards,

-- 
Bhavani Shankar
Ubuntu Developer       |  www.ubuntu.com
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi