Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Darcy Casselman]

But you can (and should!) be part of the Ubuntu community without having to
go though the approval (or verification or sponsorship or whatever) process.

Darcy.


On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Zied ALAYA <zied.alaya at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> 'Canonical Supported': it sounds like the loco is now a Canonical
> employee!
> I know that this program is sponsored by Canonical(until now), but a team
> is approved by the community of Ubuntu and we consider our selves members
> of the community.
>
> Zied ALAYA
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Martin Owens <doctormo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 08:27 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> > something like those locoteams which are active and get approved by
>> > the LoCo council will end up in the sponsored list and yet to be
>> > approved teams fall in a  not so active category?.
>>
>> Oh no, no, active would simply be 'has the group edited anything on
>> loco-teams in the past 6 months'. It's more of an extreme way to
>> discount truly inactive, abandoned groups and maybe find a way to get
>> new people involved.
>>
>> Martin,
>>
>>
>> --
>> loco-contacts mailing list
>> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement
> Zied ALAYA
> LoCo Contact de Ubuntu-tn
>  @Zied_ALAYA on Twitter<http://twitter.com/Zied_ALAYA?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=Zied_ALAYA&utm_content=140799813548650496&ref=nf>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130208/58826baa/attachment.html>