Ubuntu Moscow LoCo

[Laura Czajkowski]

On 02/04/13 19:57, Elizabeth Krumbach wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Randall Ross <randall at executiv.es> wrote:
>> Thanks for clarifying, but the reverse is also true. Rejection of city
>> teams potentially handicaps cities and larg(er) towns. The reason these
>> highly localized teams exist is that they are serving a need that is not
>> met by the current "official" nation-state structure. So, we can ignore
>> the citiess and pretend they don't exist, or we can embrace and
>> encourage them.
> So the teams I've been involved with (Pennsylvania and California)
> have regional segments within the state team, and with Pennsylvania we
> went as far as having regional "leads" - so Philadelphia had a lead,
> Harrisburg, etc. This worked out very well for us, we had the
> cohesiveness of all being in the same state to share mailing list,
> approval and LTP resources so we could all see what others were doing,
> but each leader of those regions also had autonomy to plan their own
> things.
>
> Do you think this could work for teams you're working with? If not,
> what needs are not being met that we can discuss?
>
We have a bug open about this as well if we had more people out there to
help I'm sure we could help fix this issue,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/loco-team-portal/+bug/884430

Regards

Laura

-- 
Laura Czajkowski 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/czajkowski
LoCo Council Member 
Community Council Member

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130402/add8456d/attachment-0001.html>