Best Practices and Guidelines

[Paul Tagliamonte]

CC-ing the -contacts ML

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Randall Ross <randall at executiv.es> wrote:
> Oops! My oversight.
>
> I will attempt to write this in terms of a crisp problem statement.
> Please let me know if this is on target:
>
> Problem Statement:
> "We have identified that LoCo's (at the state and country level) tend to
> focus their support and attention on a single city within their
> territory. This creates issues for other cities that want to create or
> grow their own Ubuntu groups. They are often neglected by their
> (state/country) LoCo, and by extension the broader Ubuntu community and
> Canonical."

Looks fantastic and 100% on target to me.

+1

>
> Can we seek consensus that this is indeed the problem that this thread
> is trying to solve.
>
> Either vote +1, -1 ?
>
> Cheers,
> Randall
>
>
> On 10-08-26 10:27 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Randall Ross <randall at executiv.es> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10-08-26 10:13 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can anyone think of reasons against creating this standard *
>>>>
>>> I can.
>>>
>>> We still don't have consensus on a problem statement, yet we seem to be
>>> proposing work items. Which problem are we solving?
>>>
>> Re-read my email --
>>
>> the Issue of not allowing LoCos to focus solely on a single city in a
>> state, causing the rest of the cities to be ignored by the LoCo, and
>> therefore Ubuntu and Canonical.
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Randall.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> loco-contacts mailing list
>>> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>



-- 
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq