Sarcasm and making fun of other projects in loco team lists

[Martin Owens]

> If an argument against a software project or corporation is founded on
> facts, logic, and void of emotion, I tend to pay attention. If the
> argument starts off with "Why [brand X] sucks", I lose interest quickly.
> Then again, there are those who are both informed and tactful, yet argue
> to argue. I usually just ignore them, if I know that's their general
> disposition.

So your saying that your more responsive to logos than to pathos? If I
understand you correctly.

Martin,