LoCo Team Council

[Efrain Juvenal Valles Pulgar]

This is not a thread to talk abut Money and LoCo teams. your situation is
definitively worth discussing in a new thread...

It's to talk about the Council

Efrain Valles

On 9/26/07, Pomeroy Lab <admin at mindblowingidea.com> wrote:
>
> Yes it's a local one but open to the surrounding area.
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WA-Pomeroy
> has all the details including a map.
>
> *Chris Rohde <veritastic at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
> Hey Pomeroy Lab,
> What LoCo are you running that WA won't help you promote? Is it a
> City/Localized team?
>
> bordy
>
> Pomeroy Lab wrote:
> > I only see one problem with the LoCo Locomotive. There is too much room
> for politics. I like the idea of several LoCo teams all over the world and
> one site pointing to each of them. The thing is even if we don't like
> everything they are all doing and saying we don't have to try to control
> them. Just having a general list of locations of LoCo computer labs is a
> good idea and advertising this list. I know there is politics involved in WA
> State because no one will even add my LoCo team to the list. I understand a
> set of rules that work such as the Safe Guide To Scouting for the Boy
> Scouts. This is a plain and simple set of rules that makes it impossible to
> get in trouble if you follow them and would work great with the LoCo teams
> if you just took the parts about camping out unless you wanted to allow
> Linux teams to go on camp outs as part of club activities. The thing is
> there should be some suggested guidelines but unless the Ubuntu LoCo
> federation is directly responsible for
>
> > the actions of each LoCo team I would not worry to much about
> controlling them. I would worry much more about advertising the whole thing.
> To tell you the truth a simple advertising campaign on TV or Radio in the US
> would be a very good idea. This way you could charge a monthly fee of $10.00
> to be listed on the LoCo site as a location and this money would go towards
> adds for the site. I don't see any problem here. Please let the LoCo team
> know what you think about this? In WA State and Idaho it seems like pulling
> teath to get anyone to help me promote my LoCo.
> >
> > Andi Darmawan wrote: Jono Bacon wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> One of the things I have discussed for a while is the idea of a LoCo
> >> Teams Council - this will be a council to help govern and run the LoCo
> >> community as a whole. The aim of the council will be to:
> >>
> >> * provide a governing body that people can take decisions on the wider
> >> LoCo community, and be representative of that community.
> >> * approve / reject resource requests, removing the bottlenecks that we
> >> have experienced recently.
> >> * a place for teams to take conflict issues to.
> >> * a forum in which the future plans and direction of the project can be
> >> discussed and debated.
> >> I have written up a document outlining the functions of the council at
> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoTeams/LoCoCouncil - it is largely derived
> >> from the Forums/IRC councils in how core chunks work.
> >>
> >> Please head over and read it and post comments in this thread - don't
> >> edit the page directly, this way I can merge in the changes.
> >>
> >> Jono
> >>
> >
> > LoCo Teams Council is a good idea :)
> >
> > Just a suggestions, if it's possible to make the ULTC members could
> > represent LoCo from every continent. Because the condition of running a
> > LoCo in every country may differ.
> >
> >
>
> begin:vcard
> fn:Chris Rohde
> n:Rohde;Chris
> email;internet:veritastic at gmail.com
> tel;cell:941-256-3448
> x-mozilla-html:TRUE
> version:2.1
> end:vcard
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20070926/78cdefd7/attachment-0001.htm