LoCo team website hosting
Logiotatidis Giorgos
seadog at sealabs.net
Sat Aug 27 13:05:24 CDT 2005
Στις 26-08-2005, ημέρα Παρ, και ώρα 23:32 +0100, ο/η Matthew East
έγραψε:
> On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 23:35 +0300, Logiotatidis Giorgos wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Greek Loco would like to have about 200Mb disk space. We can't
> > calculate monthly traffic because we are hosted on smurf, but the site
> > doesn't have much load.
> > We are already writing pages for our wiki and we are planning to do a
> > good job distributing ubuntu after breezy release so needs in monthly
> > traffic (and maybe disk space) are going to be greater in the next
> > months.
>
> Just a quick clarification: as far as I understand it, teams that are
> currently hosted on smurfix's (Matthias's) server can continue to do so
> if they wish! I believe this server is fairly powerful so this should be
> a decent alternative solution to teams which don't have very large
> loads. It will have the disadvantage that the teams do not have root on
> the server, but the advantage that they will not have to transfer their
> files and administrate their own server.
>
> Have I got this right? The relationship between the new Canonical
> servers and the existing solution is a little unclear, but I think that
> this is right.
According to this message from Mattias (smurf's admin)
http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/2005-June/000000.html
loco teams being hosted at his personal server will be transfered to
linode.com . For this purpose portuguese team got an account @ linode,
as far as I remember to test the service.
I understand at *all* locos from smurf are going to move either to a
server @ ubuntu or to a server from a another provider like linode, so
that's why we should define our needs. Am I wrong, or not?
Giorgos
> Matt
More information about the loco-contacts
mailing list