Should Breezy testing be removed if not done?

Duncan Lithgow duncan at
Thu Aug 3 21:43:50 BST 2006

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 00:16 -0700, Corey Burger wrote: 
> On 8/2/06, Jyrki Pulliainen <jyrki.pulliainen at> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm wondering should Breezy-section be removed from our laptop testing
> > page ( since no-one
> > has tested the laptop with Breezy and due to recent (post-Breezy)
> > changes in modules etc. I doubt it's not even fully functional under
> > Breezy.
> Testing pages should always list the last stable and current
> development. Anything else is not needed and probably can be removed
> (after all, nobody is going (should be, at any rate) to be installing
> old stable versions of Ubuntu when there is a newer stable version.
I disagree, people could have many reasons for installing an older
system. If the OS's life cycle is not over, then I can't see why it
should be deleted, it could be moved, but not _re_moved.

Linux user: 372812 | GPG key ID: 21A8C63A |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : 

More information about the laptop-testing-team mailing list