<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/27/2014 08:00 PM, c. marlow wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote cite="mid:BLU184-W304EC2715A6A31563226A1B4660@phx.gbl" type="cite"> <style></style> <div dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:12pt;" size="3" face="Verdana">hello new here to the group ^_^<br> <br> Question, I am looking for some reviews on KMAIL... Is it a good and stable and trustworthy email client?<br> <br> I am using TBIRD right now, just kind of tired of it, been using it for a couple years now, windows and NIX. I like how I can archive my folders before closing instead of having to manually copy a .Thunderbird file to back everything up<br> <br> Thanks!<br id="FontBreak"> </font><br> <br> ~ CHRISTOPHER~<br> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chris@marlows.org">chris@marlows.org</a><br> </div> </blockquote> <br> Speaking as one who used KMAIL for 8 years and loved it, and watched it be festooned with complexity (akonadi, etc), and who just gave up on it last month and switched to T-bird.... I would stay where you are.<br> <br> Too many problems with KMAIL as it is.... and in fact, when I shut it down for good and started using T-bird, the RESOURCES behind the scenes were STILL handing my email over to Kmail even though I had set all of the "shut down the resource when Kmail shuts down"... And with T-bird I have totally gotten rid of akonadi completely, which must free up a lot of cpu, memory and disk space right there.<br> <br> I wouldn't go back to Kmail on a bet.....<br> <br> <br> <br> <br> <blockquote cite="mid:BLU184-W304EC2715A6A31563226A1B4660@phx.gbl" type="cite"> <div dir="ltr"><br> </div> <br> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> <br> </blockquote> <br> <br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 1. Life isn't fair, but it's still good. - - Life's 50 Lessons </pre> </body> </html>