<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Arial'; font-size:12pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Friday 01 May 2009, Derek Broughton wrote: > My experience with Synaptic (mediocre, at best) is backed by a large amount > of feedback from users over the last 10+ years. But then again, I didn't > say it was "bad", I called it a waste of space (on a KDE system) and said > that it didn't work "well" - as in, it is still too hard to do things that > should be trivial, and the UI is weak. So what do you suggest people use? </body></html>