<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Renaud (Ron) Olgiati wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid200612071147.26007.renaud@olgiati-in-paraguay.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thursday 07 December 2006 11:03, my mailbox was graced by a missive
from clay weber <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:claydoh@claydoh.com"><claydoh@claydoh.com></a> who wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">What I truly don't understand is the general reactions I see on this
subject as I don't see it as an earth-shattering difference between the
two ways, really.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
I see it as a strange schizophrenic turn of mind, on the one hand claiming
that (unlike those people at Redmont, whom we all love to hate) "Linux is all
about freedom of choice", and on the other hand telling us the same time
that "We are K/Ubuntu of Borg, resistance is futile, you shall not use Root
or su".
Cheers,
Ron.
--
Mit der Dummheit käpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
-- Friedrich von Schiller
-- <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org">http://www.olgiati-in-paraguay.org</a> --
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
You can enable a root user, you can also use sudo as root, you can use
sudo as a user, where is the lack of choice?<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>