KMAIL

[c. marlow]

On Saturday, March 29, 2014 08:59:48 A Steve Riley wrote:
> On 2014-03-29 at 15:52, Matthew Cliffe <mattjcliffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You missed the point using it as an excuse it's wrong and allows for lazy
> > and sloppy work. There is no such thing as the average system which makes
> > it hard to target. As I said before the point it's do not use " well I
> > have
> > x resource so everyone else obviously does" as a reason for un optimized
> > code
> 
> I don't view Akonadi as lazy or sloppy. It (and Nepomuk, too) works very
> well on my machine. I have not looked at the source code, so I can't say
> for certain that the code either optimized or unoptimized. Perhaps the code
> is really bad, and abundant resources hide this. Or perhaps the code is
> already optimized, and 2 GB is simply not enough RAM.
> 
> Akonadi does more than Thunderbird. If Thunderbird is all you need, that's
> fine. But to trash Akonadi as unoptimized because it doesn't work well on
> low-resource machines is just wrong.
> 
> ...Steve

2 gigs of ram is not enough steve? Seems ok to me. Right now my system is 
using... 639.7 out of 2 gigs

and 164.4 is swap

I dont have any kinda lag and almost never have to reboot thanks to my friend 
called "KSPLICE"... So then I should be running xfce or ldxe on 2 gigs of ram?

Christopher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20140329/799e46c7/attachment.html>