Nepomuk performance
Steve Riley
stvrly at gmail.com
Wed Jan 18 21:58:38 UTC 2012
We've been discussing over at the Kubuntu Forums how surprisingly stable
Precise, KDE 4.7.97 (4.8 rc2), and Qt 4.8 are. A few are using it as their
primary setup now. Akonadi (mostly) works well with Google, KMail (mostly)
behaves the way we'd like it to, and Nepomuk/Strigi/Virtuoso/MySQL (mostly)
stay out of the way.
--Steve
On 2012-01-18 11:06:33 Jörg von Frantzius <jfrantzius at googlemail.com> wrote:
> I've got 4.7.4 here. So you're using 4.8 RC on Kubuntu 11.10?
>
> 2012/1/18 Alvin <info at alvin.be>
>
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:43:07 +0100, Jörg von Frantzius <
> >
> > jfrantzius at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> this isn't meant to be another bashing of Nepomuk + Strigi.
> >> I'm just wondering about its performance: [...]
> >
> > What version of KDE are you using? I'm currently trying out the RC of
> > 4.8
> > and my computer is actually usable now with nepomuk/strigi/virtuoso
> > enabled. It wasn't before.
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list