Virtualbox after 10.04 upgrade

[D. R. Evans]

Clay Weber said the following at 05/22/2010 06:29 PM :

> Agreed,  especially as the 3.2 available from VB themselves seems 
> to be  bit better stability-wise (for me at least). Also note that 

Where does one find an installable package for virtualbox-ose that can
replace the official lucid package(s)?

I went to the download section of virtualbox.org, and all I could see are a
list of sources (the binaries are all for non-OSE versions). I don't mind
experimenting with a non-Canonical package if it might result in a working
virtualbox under lucid, but many years' experience tells me that building
from sources is almost certainly going to be a recipe for wasting a lot of
time fighting dependency problems with the tools.

  Doc

-- 
Web:  http://www.sff.net/people/N7DR

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20100603/fc96ca4a/attachment.sig>