Spam:****, Re: 32- or 64-bit

O. Sinclair orion2000za at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Aug 6 12:52:33 BST 2010


On 06/08/2010 13:11, Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
> Lindsay,
>
> On 6 August 2010 10:49, Lindsay Mathieson<lindsay.mathieson at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 05:26:39 pm Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
>>> I am suprised that this FUD still persists. 64 bit ?ubuntu
>>> distributions  + flash works perfectly for quite a time.
>> Bollocks
> Pixies must have kept the gremlins out of my little laptop.
>
> hakan at hakan-laptop:12:08:57:~$ arch&&  uname -a&&  cat /etc/lsb-release
> x86_64
> Linux hakan-laptop 2.6.32-24-generic #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 09:20:59
> UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
> DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
> DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
> DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS"
>
> Adobe's (http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/) test page says I
> have version 10.1.53.64 and I trust it to be the correct one.
>
> And works nicely, thank you very much.
well so do I on my 32-bit system, I think the 64 here is just a counter 
not "type"

		
____________________________________________________ 
 
Yahoo! Photos is now offering a quality print service from just 7p a photo. http://uk.photos.yahoo.com



More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list