Partition problems after installing a second Kubuntu version
kassube at gmx.net
Wed Sep 9 06:26:16 UTC 2009
john d. herron wrote:
> I'm currently using Kubuntu Feisty (7.04, ext3) as 'production'
> distro. It resides as logical /dev/hda7 in the extended partition of
> my only hdd. It runs quite well except for the synaptic package
> manager, which steadfastly refuses to install things (like e.g.mysql
> or speedcrunch) because of dependency considerations (it issues 'Not
> Authenticated' warnings).
Did you change the repositories to the new location? 7.04 is no longer
supported but you find the standard Ubuntu repositories now at
<http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/>. And remember they will not get
updates anymore. I would suggest you upgrade to the current version 9.04
(or wait a few more weeks until 29.10.09 for the release of 9.10). As
there are many steps necessary for an upgrade (7.04 -> 7.10 -> 8.04 ->
9.04) it is probably best to use a fresh installation to save a lot of
> Now, when comparing the contents of Feisty's /etc/fstab and the bash
> output of df --all, I notice differences in entries relating to
> /dev/hda3. Since I'm no expert, I don't know what these differences
> might indicate, if anything.
I don't see anything about /dev/hda3 in your nearly unreadable output of
"df --all". Is that what you mean to be your concern? I suppose there is
no directory /media/hda3 in your system. If it doesn't exist, the
partition can't be mounted there. Use the command
sudo mkdir /media/hda3
in a terminal to make the directory for the mount point. BTW: The df
output would have been readable if you had used "df -h" instead of "df
Another reason for the missing hda3 partition in your df output is the
fstab line for hda3:
> /dev/hda3 /media/hda3 auto nouser,noauto,atime,rw,nodev,noexec,nosuid
The option noauto means that it will not be mounted automatically at
startup but did you try to mount it manually? Well, if you didn't, use
sudo mount /dev/hda3
and see if that works.
> I'd add a copy of the QTParted graph, but I don't know whether the
> list would carry it, and gladly provide any other info that may be
If the entire mail is small enough (don't know the limit) you can in
theory attach pictures, but it is much better to use something like
<http://picpaste.com/> and post a link with your mail.
More information about the kubuntu-users