VMware VS VirtualBox
Edmund Laugasson
ed.lau at mail.ee
Mon Mar 16 10:01:06 UTC 2009
VirtualBox have also Headless mode.
More reading:
http://www.howtoforge.com/vboxheadless-running-virtual-machines-with-virtualbox-2.0-on-a-headless-ubuntu-8.04-server
http://vmetc.com/2008/07/12/creating-and-configuring-headless-vms-in-virtualbox/
> Personaly, I used vmware-server because I don't need often console from
> hosted OS
>
> 2009/3/15 Glen Barber <glen.j.barber at gmail.com
> <mailto:glen.j.barber at gmail.com>>
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Mark Greenwood
> <fatgerman at ntlworld.com <mailto:fatgerman at ntlworld.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, "best" is subjective. Virtualbox is simple to set up and
> works well for me when I need to use Windows XP. VMWare is more
> tailored towards large scale installations and has much better
> remote management tools. I find VMWare too complex for the very tiny
> amount of use I give it, but the clincher is that Virtualbox is
> Free.. :D
> >
>
> As is vmware-server.
>
> --
> Glen Barber
>
> --
> kubuntu-users mailing list
> kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-users
>
>
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list