VMware VS VirtualBox

Edmund Laugasson ed.lau at mail.ee
Mon Mar 16 10:01:06 UTC 2009


VirtualBox have also Headless mode.

More reading:
http://www.howtoforge.com/vboxheadless-running-virtual-machines-with-virtualbox-2.0-on-a-headless-ubuntu-8.04-server
http://vmetc.com/2008/07/12/creating-and-configuring-headless-vms-in-virtualbox/

> Personaly, I used vmware-server because I don't need often console from 
> hosted OS
> 
> 2009/3/15 Glen Barber <glen.j.barber at gmail.com 
> <mailto:glen.j.barber at gmail.com>>
> 
>     On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Mark Greenwood
>     <fatgerman at ntlworld.com <mailto:fatgerman at ntlworld.com>> wrote:
>      >
>      > Yes, "best" is subjective. Virtualbox is simple to set up and
>     works well for me when I need to use Windows XP. VMWare is more
>     tailored towards large scale installations and has much better
>     remote management tools. I find VMWare too complex for the very tiny
>     amount of use I give it, but the clincher is that Virtualbox is
>     Free.. :D
>      >
> 
>     As is vmware-server.
> 
>     --
>     Glen Barber
> 
>     --
>     kubuntu-users mailing list
>     kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:kubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
>     Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-users
> 
> 





More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list