Beta 8.10 released

[Emanoil Kotsev]

excuse me that I'm posting again without being asked, but it's not matter of willing to change or not.

It's matter of stability. I and I assume many people as I don't want to change to something that causes headake.

This is the point, so until it's not stable I think kde3 should stay available somewhere and get updated, because there are still bugs.

You're very pathetic about changes, may be you have time to play or masohistic pleasure to file bugs. 

I don't! I wan't to keep the thing I am using to do my job the way it is. If its about playing I don't mind and really I have installed and still have kde4 somewhere on my drives. It's simply not stable so that I can use it for serious work.

Understand the point?

--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Billie Erin Walsh <bilwalsh at swbell.net> wrote:

> ]. The biggest 
> hurdle is peoples unwillingness to change. There are some
> out there that 
> think the CLI is the ONLY way to go. For them that's
> just fine. For 
> some, me included, KDE3.x was the cats meow.  In a couple
> years there 
> will be people that feel the same way about KDE4.x.
> That's how life is.
> 
> If your a programmer type and don't like it, make your
> own. Perhaps your 
> will take over the Linux world.
> 
> The only constant is change.
> 
> Time wounds all heels.