KOffice vs. OpenOffice

Steve Lamb grey at dmiyu.org
Wed Oct 1 19:57:16 UTC 2008


Derek Broughton wrote:
> Art Alexion wrote:
>> On Tuesday 30 September 2008 10:50:11 am Derek Broughton wrote:
>>>> On Monday 29 September 2008 8:12:53 am Derek Broughton wrote:
>>> As I detailed elsewhere - a 93 byte .csv on my own system took 95 seconds

> Well, it was 95 seconds _with_ OO already open, but I'm not sure if it would
> be slower from scratch.

    Then there is something seriously wrong with your system.  My machine is
old.  An AMD 2800+ admittedly OCed to 3200+, 2Gb of 2700 RAM and a 200Gb Sata
drive.  I built this machine 5 years ago.  To open oowriter, navigate to my
17pg. document and open it, less than a minute.  The document itself was
opened almost instantly.  I don't happen to have a 93 byte .csv to test with.
 However, I have used OOCalc a bit for some of my gaming.  The resulting
spreadsheets were a tad larger than 93 bytes.  ;)

    Let me put this in complete perspective.  I'm almost positive that my 10
year old PIII 667Mhz laptop w/256Mb of PC100 RAM might take 95 seconds from
command-line to loading document.



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081001/1dddfd54/attachment.sig>


More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list