Password question.
Steven Vollom
stevenvollom at sbcglobal.net
Mon Nov 24 01:29:35 UTC 2008
Eberhard Roloff wrote:
> Steven Vollom wrote:
>
>> Eberhard Roloff wrote:
>>
>>> Steven Vollom wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Eberhard Roloff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Steven Vollom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to set a password that allows me to enter my system that is
>>>>>> very secure, however, when I am in the system, I would like to have a
>>>>>> very simple password to enter root, perhaps as small as a couple of
>>>>>> letters. Is this possible?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steven
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> With Linux, genarally anything is possible.;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> While this is possible, I would not advise to implent it. The Ubuntu
>>>>> concept of the first user i.e. the admin user is that you use a rather
>>>>> secure password to login and then use the same to "su" to root, as needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can alter this and there are howtos to separate root to use its own
>>>>> password.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's actually quite simple but I would not advise you to do it since you
>>>>> are already familiar with the "Ubuntu way" of doing things. This is
>>>>> because, when you do it, your system will behave differently afterwards
>>>>> and you will need to treat it differently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Eberhard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry I wasn't paying adequate attention to what you just wrote. I was
>>>> already thinking of possible reasons for avoiding this. How does it
>>>> change my system? What change in behavior would be anticipated? In my
>>>> situation, is it more insecure? TIA, friend.
>>>>
>>>> Steven
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Steven,
>>>
>>> Well, I cannot answer this. There are numerous discussions around
>>> whether the Ubuntu way is more secure or not than "the other way round",
>>> which is, just for example, the SuSe or Red Hat way.
>>>
>>> Although I surely have my own opinion about this, I will not divulge it,
>>> there are to many flames around. ;-)
>>>
>>> What are the differences?
>>>
>>> Now you are just doing sudo fsck /dev/sda1
>>> alternatively when you need to be root for any length of time, you will do:
>>> sudo -i
>>> Password
>>>
>>> With a separate root account, it is similar but not at all identical.
>>> For example, sudo "something" will no longer work (except if you go and
>>> configure it) and you will most likely use "su -" to become root and
>>> then "exit" or "Ctrl+D" to exit root.
>>>
>>> Furthermore, I think you REALLY might prefer to use a strong root
>>> password and a weaker user password, since it is root where a
>>> compromised security will have potentially disastrous consequences.
>>>
>>> Again, if you are familiar with the Ubnutu way, I would strongly
>>> recommend to leave it at that.
>>>
>>> If you insist to have a separate password for root, you might google this:
>>> http://www.ubuntux.org/how-to-change-the-root-password-in-ubuntu
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Eberhard
>>>
>>>
>> Dear Eberhard,
>>
>> I know you understand my limitations; I am old, inexperienced, and do
>> not know all the ramifications of what I ask. Nonetheless, until
>> someone can convince me that I can lose more than the OS and some data,
>> I am willing to chance that, in favor of the great benefit it will serve
>> me. I don't think my advisers here in the forum believe I will ever use
>> the safer Shell. I think they believe I will just stay in Root. I also
>> believe that they probably have their computers set up to work much the
>> same as I want mine, for ease of operation, unless they are subject to
>> security issues which I am not.
>>
>> Now I want to be sure I understand. I can retain a logged in and
>> password protected sudo shell, and still have a more safe [not password
>> protected] Shell to work from. _I do not want to be in Root all the
>> time_. _I just want to be able to enter that security without have to
>> type it in more than once per session_. I don't feel that I am mistake
>> proof, if I stay in Root all the time. I believe _I am 100% safe with
>> an already logged in Root Shell, if I can work from a secured shell, and
>> when all I need to do is click on the Session menu item in the shell
>> program and open Root Shell and already be logged in._ The contrast of
>> their appearance will always be a reminder that I am on dangerous
>> ground, and I will be careful. I have to do that and be careful when I
>> get sudo privileges anyway, don't I?
>>
>> _I DO NOT want to change to a root password, if I cannot have a safer
>> shell to work from_. It is important. I am always a little stressed
>> when I enter a root command. I am certain before I press the enter
>> key. Please respond one more time to confirm that I can do what I want
>> to do and still have a safer Shell to work from. With gratitude. And
>> lastly, I promise that if my decision is foolish, and I screw up, I will
>> post the truth and eat the necessary crow, so that the forum can prosper
>> from loss. I actually believe that it is only appropriate as a solution
>> for people with a similar problem, or for those who have an equally
>> important reason for doing it.
>>
>> The feature I am struggling to get back is one I regretted losing, when
>> I upgraded from Feisty to Gutsy. That feature helped me a lot. And I
>> used it the way I described. _Please answer, I won't go to that website
>> if you don't.
>> _
>> Steven
>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> ok. Back to square one. What I understand:
> You want to have a root shell always open to accept root commands.
>
> This is somewhat different from what I originally understood, i.e. you
> want a root user with a different password.
>
> Now:
> Given that there are a multitude of possibilities, only two come to my mind:
>
> 1.
> You can have a root shell, opened once and open all the time until you
> log out without any change to the system.
>
> Simply open a shell of your choice at startup and then issue the command
> "sudo -i" without the quotes
>
> After giving your password this shell will be open until you close it.
>
>
> 2.
>
> If you want to have a seperate user password for root AND have a
> permanently open root shell, then go to the webpage I googled for you,
> follow the very easy instructions there, and finally change root's
> password to something that you like.
>
> Then after your system starts up, you open a shell or a KDE rootshell,
> enter your password (in the KDE rootshell) or issue the command:
> "su -" (in the regular user shell). After giving your newly created root
> password, this shell will remain open as long as you do not close it.
>
> Hopefully I now covered what you are needing.
>
> If not, I am sorry
>
> Kind regards
> Eberhard
>
>
>
Eberhard, you have me in a belly laugh. This has been so fun. I truly
want to hug you. Everyone I know gets a hug when I see them. It is
just the way I am for those I love.
To be sure I have the correct choice, because I do have concerns that I
could make a serious mistake. I would like to type in my 37 digit
password to open the operating system when I boot up. In the Shell
dropdown, I would like to have at least two choices. Choice one, Shell
steven at Studio25:~$ for my work, and steven at Studio25:~# for Root
changes. Mostly I will be working in a shell with white print over a
black backgroung. When I open the Root Shell, it will be Black print on
a white background, glaringly different. I won't even have to think
when I open it, it will, by it's colors be a reminder, because you don't
open Root very often. And I only want to open it once a day.
Eberhard, it seems if the web site instruction allows what I want it
would actually be better than keeping an active Root Shell on my
drop-down links, but only because I will probably open it unnecessarily
some times. The other way, it is tucked inside an Icon that provides
the two options. By the way, I am still laughing. This has been so
fun, and funny to me. If I have this right, the way I described, Thank
You!!!!
Cheers! Ciao, and Cordially,
Steven
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list