Is this possible?

Jason Straight jason at jeetkunedomaster.net
Sun Nov 9 16:43:00 UTC 2008


On Friday 07 November 2008 03:46:01 Knapp wrote (Reply at bottom):
> I will say it again. The problems are not with KDE changing and
> improving. That is the right thing for them to do!!!!!!!!!! The
> problem is with making a program, OS, Desktop the standard before it
> is ready!!!!! The set up of 8.04, with kde4 in the background is the
> way it should have stayed for at least one more year. Then when the
> change was made people would be saying WOW, GREAT. At the same time
> KDE3 should in this edition with the switch be an option in the
> background so that grumpy, hate to change types don't have to!
> The way this change is being done by Kubuntu is really bad (I would
> say stupid but I learn from others mistakes) IMOHO.


Yeah, I knew this was going to happen back when I first tried kde4.0 and saw it 
wasn't ready for casual users. KDE 4.0 never should have been released as it 
was, and the problem was compounded by kubuntu adopting it. People expect 
'releases' to be stable and complete. So you had KDE calling 4.0, kubuntu 
adopting it - who woudl think it was in sad a shape as it still it.

Still I use it, I can get by with it, and I'm growing to like some of the 
features and improvements but I still miss the ability to do some of the most 
trivial things that any .0 or .1, or .1.1 or .1.2, or .1.3 release should 
have.

Personally I'd have to agree that 3.5.10 should have been in intrepid with 4 
available optionally.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081109/58c788a7/attachment.html>


More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list