Is this possible?

[Art Alexion]

On Friday 07 November 2008 9:32:28 am Jared Greenwald wrote:
> I thought Hardy was LTS?
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca> wrote:
> > Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> >> it's always reasonable to stick with LTS.
> >
> > And that's the heart of the problem, because we really don't _have_ a
> > Kubuntu LTS.  Yes, Dapper is still in support, but it was never supposed
> > to still be the current LTS at this time.

Now, Jared, see how hard it is to read this when Derek used the accepted 
practice and bottom posted, while you ignored it and top posted.  After that, 
no matter where I post, it becomes hard to read.

That said, it has been repeated ad nauseum on this list and elsewhere: Kubuntu 
Hardy — unlike Ubuntu, Edubuntu and Xubuntu — is not LTS.  This decision was 
apparently made so that the Kubuntu team would not have to support KDE 3.5 
long term.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081107/6fd37a4a/attachment.sig>