Konqueror rules, Dolphin must die

[Willy K. Hamra]

Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> 
>> On Sunday 02 November 2008 17:29:04 Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
>>> Come on guys are you lawyers of stupidity. Saying something is not
>>> criminal thing, especially using hypothetical (subjunctive) expression
>>> like "should"
>> It can be in this country (England and Wales), and children as young as 10
>> have been arrested by the police because of things said in a playground
>> brawl.
> 
> And taking stupid decisions by bankers or in our case kubuntu developers is
> not subject of crime?! May be the system is not perfect? What do you think?
> 

no it's not, you are free to use their programs, but it's THEIR
programs, they can do whatever they want, you don't like it, then stop
using it!

>> Suggesting soneone's fingers be cut off could be prosecuted under several
>> laws, e.g. it is certainly enticement to violence.
> 
> The expression that "somebodies fingers should be chopped" means I am pretty
> pissed off, not that I'm willing to do it and not that I mean this
> seriously. This also implies that this person does not have a brain ;-) May
> be this is too complicated for your politeness sick minds to understand. I
> can't believe all of you take this literary and don't understand how ugly
> this sounds to me.
> 

sick minds? and you consider yourself not rude? this is outright rudeness!

> Also I'm sorry for your children in England and Wells, because you are
> oppressive. You just squash them in stereotypes so they look like the same
> and think the same. Freedom in spirit and freedom in mind makes you a
> person. It's easier to arrest someone then teaching him/her. Also I'm not a
> child. I've been educated to watch out what I'm saying in public and to be
> polite to people that are polite to me, but obviously either I'm more
> tolerant or do not take such statements literary, because I don't care that
> much if someone says something like this to me unless he or she tries to
> really do it. I would rather understand that the person is really pissed of
> if using such expressions.
> 

keep deluding yourself dude, nobody said anything about making them look
and think the same, nobody said anything about squashing freedoms, they
their freedoms alright. it's just rude, nasty, impolite, ugly thoughts
that are of concern here. thinking in violent terms grows to violent
behaviour, and no one said they're not teaching them. are you not
familiar with where young people go when arrested? they go to special
facilities and are educated there, each in accordance to his/her
condition, because seriously, any kid talking about chopping fingers in
a playground, is a very big concern. a lot of people wouldn't care about
a kid saying offensive things, and consider it normal, ut so far, i have
never ever looked at a kid and said,"this one will be a real
troublemaker when he grows up" and been wrong! this stuff needs to be
pruned at a very early stage, or it will develop to more serious
misbehaviours!

> And for second time people here look at how I say things but miss what I
> say. I still think I'm right and I don't understand what's your problem. I
> will not change.

once someone inserts 1 rude word in a 1000+ words speech, this one word
will scratch and hurt the listeners more than all others, and in the
end, they will only remember this particular word.
if you are politer, people might start noticing the more important
points you're trying to show.



-- 
Willy K. Hamra
Manager of Hamra Information Systems
Co. Manager of Zeina Computer & Billy Net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: w_hamra1987.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081103/e852b323/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20081103/e852b323/attachment.sig>