Firefox on KDE4: ugly and will stay ugly (with screenshot)

[Dotan Cohen]

2008/6/29 Art Alexion <art.alexion at verizon.net>:
> On Sunday 29 June 2008 16:11:08 Michael Leone wrote:
>> Outside of the fact that it's dull and ugly (altho I'm sure others
>> love it, as it's not cluttered and flashy), how is that a "bug"?
>
> Most of my favorite apps are KDE, and I look forward to the KDE 4 versions.
> But I am one of those people who don't like cluttered and flashy.  WinXP had
> the option to use a "classic", Win2k-like interface.  Any chance we will get
> an option to turn off a lot of the kde 4 desktop flash and just use the new
> apps for their improved functionality?  And will we still be able to use
> Konqueror as a file manager, with all of the different views, the service
> menus, the ability to mange files from an ftp site as if they were on a local
> network with tabs and drag and drop, the audiocd:/ functionality, smb:/ and
> fonts:/, etc.?  I have removed dolphin from my current KDE 3.9 system.
>

Please don't highjack the thread. Start a new thread with those
questions (and I'll answer them there). Thanks.

Dotan Cohen

http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?