Threading issue

[David McGlone]

On Monday 28 January 2008 8:21:20 pm David McGlone wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008 7:05:48 pm D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> > On Monday 28 January 2008, Richard wrote:
> > > allot to see, if there are any new post to old threads.( messages that
> > > are not being watch), this is very time consuming.
> >
> > I don't know how to do what you want.  How I handle this myself, when
> > I've read everything at the top, I hit keypad + to jump down yonder
> > wherever the next stray thread bit is, and continue in that fashion until
> > I'm out of messages.  It's a lot more efficient than scrolling around
> > trying not to miss something.
>
> Why not just change the "order of arrival" so that the newest messages are
> on top of the thread?

Sorry, I tried after I replied and it doesn't work this way. It moves the 
whole thread and doesn't reverse the order of the messages under the message 
that started the thread.

-- 
David M.