KDE 4.0.0!

[Sylviane et Perry White]

On Saturday 19 January 2008 19:33, Derek Broughton wrote:
> Sylviane et Perry White wrote:
(snip)
> > If a set has only one element the set is the same as the element, right?
> No.  I'm arguing that KDE 4 is not a set at all.
We all expect it to become one.
(snip)
> > should the definition of the version change, from not-container to
> > container, "at this time", when a new revision is added?
>
> Not at all.  KDE 4 is a desktop environment.  It is synonymous (that's
> English, not Math) with KDE 4.0.0.  But in another sense, yes, it _will_
> change with time. 
(snip)
 > There will come a time when there's a KDE 4.1 and a KDE 4.0, then you might 
speak of KDE4 as a "set"
It would be strange that a mathemetician can hold the notion that something 
only becomes a set as elements are added into it, what about the empty set?
But I guess that is not what you are saying. You claim we still don't know 
what KDE4 is, and that we have no authority yet to call it a set, impossible 
to disprove. Then it is just my feeling/expectation that KDE4 is/will-become
a set.

Cheers		Perry
-- 
BOFH excuse #233: TCP/IP UDP alarm threshold is set too low