KDE 4.0.0!

[Billie Walsh]

Wulfy wrote:
> O. Sinclair wrote:
>   
>> Wulfy wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> (KDE 4.0 is not KDE4).
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Several times I've heard this now so I have a question (not just to 
>>> Dotan, who is only quoting what the KDE Developers said).  If KDE 4.0 is 
>>> not KDE4, what is it?  It's not KDE3...
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-12-30/
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> <quote>KDE 4.0 is not KDE4 but only the first (4.0.0 even non-bugfix) 
> release in a years-long KDE 4 series to come.</quote>
>
> This, as it stands, is a contradiction.  If they'd said "KDE 4.0 is not 
> what KDE4 will become", that would be true.  But if KDE 4.0 is not KDE4, 
> it can't be the first release of KDE4, it's some other beast...  or is 
> my logic flawed in some way?
>
>   
No. Your logic is fine. Stephen Binner should be a politician. He has
"double-speak" down to a fine art.