KDE 4.0.0!

[Derek Broughton]

Terence Simpson wrote:

> WANSTALL Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> It has already been explained at least once in this thread...and it made
>> complete logical sense. If you extrapolate it out, it certainly seems
>> that KDE4 _was_ the factor that ruled out the LTS...it's the only
>> logical answer.
>>
> KDE4 being in existence yes, Kubuntu choosing it for release no, that
> was after we were informed we weren't going to be LTS.

Sorry, I thought that was what I was saying.  The mere fact of KDE4 being
around puts canonical into a difficult situation re support.  I don't see
that they had an option.
-- 
derek