KDE 4.0.0!

[Michael W. Holdeman]

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 05:01:10 am Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 16/01/2008, O. Sinclair <o.sinclair at gmail.com> wrote:
> > And as I have pointed out in another thread I, and many others, think
> > you are doing it the wrong way round. Keep 3.5 as the base package and
> > KDE4 as a bleeding-edge add-on. As it is - even according to the main
> > developers "KDE 4.0.0 is not KDE4"
> > http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-12-30/
>
> Exactly. Then you have Kubuntu as a stable, feature-rich operating
> system with optional bleeding edge components.
>
> If Kubuntu should be a bleeding-edge distro (as is now planned) then
> it is not suitable for everyday use. I replace Windows XP (usually
> cracked) on about three or four machines a month for other students in
> my university. As Kubuntu is their first impression of Linux, I must
> ensure that it is a good impression. I'll probably stick with Feisty
> until I land a new distro, though. Any suggestions for a KDE based
> distro that is easy for noobs?
>
> Dotan Cohen
>
Sheesh,

While I agree I'm not throwin the towell in so quick. I'll continue to convert 
ppl using kubuntu and 3.5.8, and continue to work with 4.0.0 on my laptop, 
wihich is my main machine that I DO get all my work done on!.

Mike
> א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?