dotancohen at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 10:01:10 GMT 2008
On 16/01/2008, O. Sinclair <o.sinclair at gmail.com> wrote:
> And as I have pointed out in another thread I, and many others, think
> you are doing it the wrong way round. Keep 3.5 as the base package and
> KDE4 as a bleeding-edge add-on. As it is - even according to the main
> developers "KDE 4.0.0 is not KDE4"
Exactly. Then you have Kubuntu as a stable, feature-rich operating
system with optional bleeding edge components.
If Kubuntu should be a bleeding-edge distro (as is now planned) then
it is not suitable for everyday use. I replace Windows XP (usually
cracked) on about three or four machines a month for other students in
my university. As Kubuntu is their first impression of Linux, I must
ensure that it is a good impression. I'll probably stick with Feisty
until I land a new distro, though. Any suggestions for a KDE based
distro that is easy for noobs?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
More information about the kubuntu-users