KDE 4.0.0!

[O. Sinclair]

Terence Simpson wrote:
> WANSTALL Malcolm wrote:
>> Terence Simpson wrote:
>>   
>>> Derek Broughton wrote:
>>>     
>>>> Richard A. Johnson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>       
>> <<SNIP>>
>>
>>   
>>>>> KDE 4 was not the reason to drop LTS support for our 3.5.x branch,
>>>>>     
>>>>>         
>>>> Of course it was.
>>>>   
>>>>       
>>> An explanation of that last statement would be appreciated Derek.
>>>     
>> It has already been explained at least once in this thread...and it made
>> complete logical sense. If you extrapolate it out, it certainly seems
>> that KDE4 _was_ the factor that ruled out the LTS...it's the only
>> logical answer.
>>
>> -Mal
>>
>>   
> KDE4 being in existence yes, Kubuntu choosing it for release no, that 
> was after we were informed we weren't going to be LTS.
> 
And as I have pointed out in another thread I, and many others, think 
you are doing it the wrong way round. Keep 3.5 as the base package and 
KDE4 as a bleeding-edge add-on. As it is - even according to the main 
developers "KDE 4.0.0 is not KDE4"
http://commit-digest.org/issues/2007-12-30/

Sinclair