KDE 4.0.0!

[Art Alexion]

On Sunday 13 January 2008 01:19:13 Terence Simpson wrote:
> >>> Well, yes, as it originally _was_ a file manager before it was a web
> >>> browser. And so far as I've been led to understand (please RTFM me
> >>> with information otherwise) Konqueror retains all it's features for
> >>> KDE4.
> >>>
> >>> Dotan Cohen
> >>>      
> >>
> >> No, Konqueror uses the Dolphin KPart to use some file managing features.
> >> (A KPart is like a plugin, not exactly the same but a decent analogy for
> >> this)
> >>    
> >
> >  Terence,
> >
> > first off, let me laugh. LOL I'm sorry man are you new to linux or kde?
> > Konqueror has been a file manager since I don't know how long, let me say
> > RH 6.1 or somewhere around there. can anyone verify? Anyway I've been
> > using konqueror as a file manager for quite a few years I'd say a good 6
> > or 8 years and been using linux for around 10 or 12 years. Also from what
> > I can see, I believe you got it backwards, wouldn't it make more sense if
> > dolphin was using the konqueror kpart since konqueror has been around as
> > a file manager for a long long time. Matter of fact all dolphin is, is a
> > stripped down and re-arranged konqueror with a different name. :-)
> >
> >  
>
> David,
> To answer your questions:
> 1) No
> 2) No
> 3) Didn't say it wasn't
> 4) There is no Konqueror KPart for file managing, only the Dolplin KPart.

I hope you are wrong.  Is this a Kubuntu thing or the direction of upstream 
KDE?

IMO Dolphin is the first successful Linux virus.  If you are right, it 
destroyed my beloved Konqueror.

Is there a way to restore the KDE 4 Konqueror to the previous profiles and 
capabilities?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20080114/85ac46d0/attachment.sig>