KDE 4.0.0!

[Girard Henri]

I guess the 11/1 was an US "marketing" date (11/10) ??
it should have been "ran" on 25/12/ at xchrismas for a more universal 
purpose ! lol

Jason Straight a écrit :
> On Saturday 12 January 2008 23:55:01 Howard Coles Jr. wrote:
>   
>> On Saturday 12 January 2008 09:51:57 pm Terence Simpson wrote:
>>     
>>> Edwin Sendjaja wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Eduardo, I have the same opinion with you. Well, this version should be
>>>> beta version.
>>>> I hope they will fix and add some funktions that kde 3.5.8 has already.
>>>> Who expect it to be supermega fast and supermega solid. We just want a
>>>> better destop than kde3.5.8, which is already super good amd super
>>>> solid.
>>>>         
>>> If you want to compare it to 3.5.8 then please wait until 4.5.8, then
>>> you'll be comparing things on an equal standing.
>>>       
>> I have to disagree here.  4.0 is the NEXT release in the KDE series, its
>> supposed to be better.  KDE 3 was way better than KDE 2.whatever, as I
>> recall, and KDE 2 was better than KDE 1.  We have a long history of
>> expecting better, not "as good".   What you are saying sounds like you work
>> for M$.
>>
>> Don't release a desktop just because its time, and expect me to act happy
>> about it if its crap.  Sorry, but I've read this thread, and over and over
>> again I'm hearing "can't do this" and "can't do that".  Can't resize, no
>> customization, no this, and no that.  It has me seriously worried about
>> running it.
>>     
>
> I have to agree here. While I appreciate the effort into KDE4, and I'm sure 
> it'll turn out to be a great piece of work (probably quite soon, KDE is 
> usually pretty quick with updates) I don't think the current stage of KDE4.0 
> is really something that should be called anything more than beta quality.
>
> A final release should be able to run more than 24 hrs w/o crashing, should 
> have all it's components (PIM,KDM) up to date and working, and certainly 
> should have waited until the most anticipated part of it was more than 2 
> months old (plasma), and had it's features in place.
>
> I'm not at all dismayed with the work so far, just that it was rushed to be 
> called RC, and gold.
>
>
>