Konqueror the ultimate Linux tool or cool things you can do with it

Knapp magick.crow at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 16:56:52 UTC 2008

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca>wrote:

> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > 2008/8/16 Derek Broughton <news at pointerstop.ca>:
> >> sftp: is more efficient than fish:.  Certainly I'd recommend to use it
> >> anywhere you can.  But the wonderful advantage of fish: is that you can
> >> use
> >> it _anywhere_ you can ssh, even if it doesn't have an sftp server!  It
> >> does this by copying a small script to the account you log into via ssh,
> >> that essentially acts as an ftp server.
> >
> > Efficient in what manner? Faster? (I have not noticed a speed difference)
> Good question.  It falls under the category of "I've been told...".  I tend
> to either access systems that are painfully slow _anyway_, or blindingly
> fast in every case, so I can't say I've seen a difference either.  Maybe
> I'll play with fish on one of the slow ones today, and see if it's notably
> worse.
> > What is the name of the script that fish creates? I've not noticed this.
> ~/.fishsrv.pl
> --
> derek
> So is there a good reason to debug fish? IT sounds like sftp is better
anyway and it works just fine now?

Douglas E Knapp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-users/attachments/20080819/03f05583/attachment.html>

More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list