When will 64bit be on equal par to 32bit
manchicken at notsosoft.net
Thu Jun 21 23:59:09 BST 2007
On Thursday 21 June 2007 17:51:02 D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> On Thursday 21 June 2007, Douglas Phillipson wrote:
> > Has there been any discussions as to when 64 bit Linux will be
> > predominant. Is this a slow adoption thing or is there a actual date in
> > mind? I guess it has to happen before 2038 doesn't it?
> The reason I don't bother with 64-bit is because of proprietary,
> closed-source add-on stuff that is reputedly a pain in the ass to get
> working on 64-bit. I've never even tried. I really don't *need* 64-bit for
> anything, there's nothing tangible to gain, so why even take a chance on
> adding some new layer of irritation, just to say I'm using all my bits?
> D. Michael McIntyre
I believe that Mr. Philipson was referring to the signed 32-bit integer issue.
A move to something other than the 32-bit architecture as it stands today is
inevitable. For more information on the 2038 issue, see
As far as how har amd64 is, I run it here and it works just fine. For crappy
things that require 32-bit stuff--I only have browser plugins to worry about
there--I keep a separate 32-bit build of Firefox and it works quite nicely.
I know many folks who run amd64 without much trouble at all. It's a great
architecture, and Ubuntu fully supports it.
~ manchicken <><
(A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nfluence with large hammer.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
More information about the kubuntu-users