Lexmark Z645 Printer

[David McGlone]

On Monday 03 December 2007 3:31:51 pm Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 03 December 2007, David McGlone wrote:
> >On Sunday 02 December 2007 9:15:20 pm D. Michael McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sunday 02 December 2007, David McGlone wrote:
<snip>

> >My definition of "shady" is where I am walking that thin line between
> > trusting Lexmark and not trusting them. In no way am I saying they make
> > bad printers.
>
> I will.  We bought some of the $400 laser ones for the news dept several
> years ago, roughly half a ream of paper a day through them.  We put cookie
> sheets under them to catch the small parts that fell out daily, thinking I
> could stay ahead of them by re-installing the pieces.  I couldn't keep up,
> so that experiment was terminated in about 3 weeks, replaced them all with
> 2 HP 4050's.  And a service contract...

Wow. That's way worse than what I went through with them.

-- 
David M.