Lexmark Z645 Printer

David McGlone d.mcglone at att.net
Tue Dec 4 00:10:04 UTC 2007


On Monday 03 December 2007 5:43:56 pm David Fletcher wrote:
> > It's not really about my personal experience, but how I was tricked into
> > spending my hard earned money on something that made a claim that they
> > knew was not completely true. There's really no other word than "shady"
> > that I could use unless I started using the word "deception". But then I
> > would be lying because Lexmark was not totally lying. In other words when
> > you look at a product and think about buying it, but you have very
> > serious doubts
>
> because
>
> > of trust issues, then I call that shady.
>
> Personally, if I'd fallen for that one I'd have deemed the printer to
> be "Unsuitable for the purpose for which it was sold" and gone back to the
> shop to demand a refund. Failing that, next call would be to the Trading
> Standards Office.

Oh it got returned. No doubt about it, but I was still upset because the store 
I purchased it from was 25 - 30 minutes away so it pretty much ate up my gas 
and my time having to do so.


-- 
Let him choose out of my files, his projects to accomplish.
		-- Shakespeare, "Coriolanus"




More information about the kubuntu-users mailing list