should "apt-get dist-upgrade" include kernel updates???

[Joe(theWordy)Philbrook]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



It would appear that on May 8, Thilo Six did say:

> Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote the following on 07.05.2006 01:33:
> > deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ breezy-backports main restricted universe multiverse
> > deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ breezy-backports main restricted universe multiverse
> 
> You do know that you now have a system fully updated to backports, do you?

You say that like that could be a bad thing...

OK, I'll confess that I don't understand apt-get very well.

I was (barely) using yum on fedora when I tried kubuntu, and was amazed
how easy it was to get apt-get up. And sort of decided to wing it.

I have a nagging suspicion that maybe I'd be better off commenting out
the backports lines until/unless I need something specific. But?????

   #############################################################
   ##_if_you'd_prefer_an_clearsigned_".asc"_text_file_of_this_##
   ##message_as_an_mime_encoded_attachment,just_ask_me_while__##
   ##it's_STILL_IN_my_outbox_folder_._._._=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+;-)_##
   #gpg sig for: Joe (theWordy) Philbrook DSA key ID 0x6C2163DE#
   # You can find my public gpg key at http://pgpkeys.mit.edu/ #
   #############################################################
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYLNJRZ/61mwhY94RAn7tAKDC7m/WizNdXbxr1LO8jQ+esxAKkwCgng2V
GuXOUKYZS3bUSrVaI51A0Lw=
=96Pk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
|      ?           ?		
|			
|        -=-   -=-	 I'm NOT clueless...    	
|        <?>   <?>    	But I just don't know.  	
|            ^          Joe (theWordy) Philbrook           
|           ---  	     J(tWdy)P
|			  <jtwdyp at ttlc.net> 
|      ?           ?