Mass convert MP3 to Ogg
james at grayonline.id.au
Mon Jul 10 01:43:12 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mark A. Taff wrote:
> On Friday 07 July 2006 04:44, James Gray wrote:
>> Pupeno wrote:
>>> On Friday 07 July 2006 04:46, James Gray wrote:
>>>>  Again, not 100% accurate. You *can* do lossless manipulation of
>>>> JPEG's and PNG's but not lossless conversion between the two as they use
>>>> different compression algorithms.
>>> Isn't PNG's compression algorithm lossless ? I always thought it was.
>> PNG can use either a lossless or lossy compression - it all depends on
>> how the programmer decides to implement compression. Most
>> implementations of PNG encoding I've seen employ a lossy compression
>> algorithm as the results are "good enough" with significant benefits for
>> file size (same rationale as JPEG, and basically every other lossy
>> Have a read - it's a good high-level overview of what PNG is and isn't,
>> and how it's implemented. :)
> PNG *is* lossless, and the page you cited says the same thing. Nowhere did it
> say that lossy compression algorithms are used. The only place they even
> mention lossy is when taking about jpegs.
> If a program were to use a lossy algorithm to create a PNG, that file would in
> fact *not* be a PNG.
> Maybe you ought to reread that page yourself?
FWIW, I *did* read it, but read the following sentence as "lossy"
instead of "losslessly":
'Compression filters are a way of transforming the image data
Despite the rest of the page only referring to lossless compression
algorithms (Zlib, 7-zip and deflate). Gah. :P
Meh, so shoot me. My point still stands about conversion between lossy
formats which is what I was originally stating. I misread a document
and sited an correct format (namely PNG) as being lossy, when in fact it
To that end, my citation of JPEG still stands - and yes, I *know* you
can do lossless editing of JPEG's but that involves expanding them to a
lossless format as an intermediate step (whether that's done in memory
or on the file system is purely an implementation decision).
Apologies for any confusion.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kubuntu-users