art.alexion at verizon.net
Mon Dec 11 17:17:52 UTC 2006
Sorry, Tez, I don't mean to be difficult. I LIKE sudo most of the time,
On Thursday 07 December 2006 16:48, Tez wrote:
> Art Alexion wrote:
> > On Thursday 07 December 2006 09:03, Raphaël Pinson wrote:
> >> `sudo -i` and `sudo -s` provide you a root console that lets you use
> >> this program just the same as if you were logged as user root.
> > So if you get a root console, with all of its insecurities, why is doing
> > it that way better than just su?
> 1) only members of the adm group can get a root shell and
And how is this different/better than only giving admins the root password?
> 2) you don't have to give out a root password for more than 1 user to
> run privileged commands.
And letting people use their own password to perform root activities is more
secure than restricting who gets a password because ... ?
I like sudo. I find it easier than su -c. I also feel that those who play
loose with root logins are asking for trouble. Root security is not just
about multiple users; its about being careful about running certain
potentially damaging commands. That said, I don't understand the religious
zeal that people have about sudo, pro or con.
Typing sudo just ain't that big a deal most of the time for sudo haters, and
having to get and use a separate root password can't be less secure than
using the same one for everything.
PGP fingerprint: 52A4 B10C AA73 096F A661 92D2 3B65 8EAC ACC5 BA7A
The attachment - signature.asc - is my electronic signature; no need for
alarm. Info @
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the kubuntu-users