Servers down? <SOLVED>(Correction)
Mitch Thompson
mitchthompson at satx.rr.com
Mon Nov 28 04:07:26 UTC 2005
Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
>
>
>>Mitch Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Mitch Thompson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>L. Boggio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Le 27/11/05, Mitch Thompson a dit :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I have been unable to do an "apt-get update" since yesterday evening.
>>>>>>When I run the comand, I get the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>root at colossus:~# apt-get update
>>>>>>Err http://security.ubuntu.com breezy-security Release.gpg
>>>>>>Could not connect to security.ubuntu.com:80 (82.211.81.138). - connect
>>>>>>(111 Connection refused)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>.../...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com breezy/restricted Packages
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The sites are "up", they can be pinged and tracerouted to. If I go to
>>>>>>the site with Mozilla, I get an index page of the wwwroot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyone else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Nope, I've got no problems... didn't you set some security tweaks that
>>>>>could block apt-get and allow Mozilla ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That very well could be. Time to start digging...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Well, duh. Sometimes it pays for the left-hand to know what the right
>>>one is doing...
>>>
>>>I use IPCop as my router/firewall. It is very good. Anyway, I recently
>>>installed DansGuardian, and made my proxy into a transparent proxy. Any
>>>attempt to try to bypass the proxy gets a refused requester. I wasn't
>>>putting that event together with these error messages.
>>>
>>>So, I put the appropriate entries into /etc/apt/apt.conf to tell apt-get
>>>where the proxy port is, and all is well again.
>>>
>>>Thank you very much, L. Boggio, for pointing me in the right direction.
>>>--
>>>Mitch Thompson, San Antonio, Texas//WB5UZG
>>>Red Hat Certified Engineer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Isn't the point of a transparent proxy that it requires *no* client side
>>configuration? Isn't the firewall supposed to forward http ports to the
>>correct IP address and port of the proxy?
>>
>>
>>
>
> The above should read "http requests" not "http ports".
>
>
True. And I had /thought/ I had set transparent proxy on, but hadn't.
It is on now.
However, the firewall still wasn't letting anything get through on the
normal port 80.
--
"In Paris they simply stared when I spoke to them in French; I never did
succeed in making those idiots understand their own language." -- Mark Twain
--
Mitch Thompson, San Antonio, Texas//WB5UZG
Red Hat Certified Engineer
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list