<html><head></head><body><div class="yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:16px;"><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"> <span>Given that KDE have effectively taken over regular maintenance of the QT 5.x version (for non-commercial users), would it make sense to switch to KDE's release instead of QT's?</span><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><span><br></span></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">KDE rebased their repo to QT 5.15.3 a few weeks ago in this commit: <a href="https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qt5/-/commit/dc01793b3b194302a0174921cc30bfc15c985bf4" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://invent.kde.org/qt/qt/qt5/-/commit/dc01793b3b194302a0174921cc30bfc15c985bf4</a> so they bring in all the latest changes from QT while adding other fixes of their own including for Wayland support. I realise that this may require changes upstream in Debian (which are discussed here: <a href="https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwayland/-/merge_requests/5" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="">https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtwayland/-/merge_requests/5</a>), so could Kubuntu backports be a good place to make KDE's version of QT available?</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Thanks,</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Mike</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></body></html>