Kubuntu Vision Meeting - Last minute announcement

[Clay Weber]

On Monday, November 7, 2016 11:56:48 AM EST Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN wrote:
> IMO we don't need visual at all. All we need to show, we can pass as links.
> 
> I agree with Mumble. Then we could have a 1 or 2 hour meeting. Otherwise,
> in text only, IMO the meeting will take at least 4 hours, and probably
> split it again.
> 
> My issue with Text only meetings, is that we waste a lot of time waiting
> for people to answer, and we suspect they are typing, when they are
> actually not.
> Also it takes a loot of time to type to get a message through. The Words
> per minute is lower on Text only than voice meetings. That's what makes me
> feel the text only meeting is less productive.
> 
Again, if this is simply a brainstorm session, I could agree with you on this. 
On important, and official business the extra time to type things also involves 
thought and consideration, so imo the 'wasted" aspect is not totally accurate. 

Impatience is not enough reason to forgo a logged and accessible meeting,


-- 
Clay Weber (claydoh)